A few years ago an interviewer asked me a question that
startled me: “You come from a large family, yet in nearly all of your books,
the main character is an only child. Why is that? Have you ever thought about
writing about a large family?”
I answered by saying something about how it was difficult to
negotiate a large number of characters, and how I wanted the focus of my
stories to be on the protagonist. But the truth was, I had never thought about
it.
I thought about it a lot after that.
I grew up the oldest of seven kids in a safe, loving,
chaotic environment. Each child who came into our family had to figure out how
to live, how to be an individual, and how to be noticed.
For me it was pretty straightforward. I was the first-born,
and I would always be the first. All I had to do was show up for meals and stay
out of serious trouble, and when I failed at either of those things (as I often
did), I knew I would be forgiven and given another chance.
My youngest sibling, Jim, was born when I was twelve. As the
“baby” of the family, he had a relatively easy gig too. Everything he did was
cute, our parents’ disciplinary teeth had been worn smooth, and his older
siblings provided a surplus of examples on how to behave—and misbehave.
My five middle siblings traveled a more intricate path, but
they all found their way. Each of them discovered ways in which they were
special, whether it be academically, artistically, socially, athletically, or
in other areas. There was more to it, of course. The point is, every one of them
learned how to stand out, how get their strokes.
I’ve read a lot about birth order, and how it shapes
children. Everything from intelligence to sexual orientation to criminality is supposedly influenced by birth order. Most of the literature is highly speculative or downright bogus, and
the numbers are inconclusive, but the idea that birth order matters has a gut
level appeal. Is “middle child syndrome” a real thing? Maybe, maybe not—but it
seems like it should be.
I decided to write an “upper-middle-grade” (10-14) book about a
middle child. At first I intended to create a large family similar to the one I
grew up in, but the logistics frightened me. I didn’t want to write an enormous
book, so I scaled back my ambition, and set out to write about the smallest number
of siblings possible that could include a “middle child.” That would be three.
That book is Slider.
Fourteen-year-old David Miller is sandwiched between an academically
overachieving older sister, and a severely autistic younger brother.
…I label myself the
beef in a Sooperslider. You know what a Sooperslider is, right? It’s like a
White Castle. We don’t have White Castles in Iowa, but it’s the same thing: a
greasy wafer of pulverized cow in a squishy bun half the size of your palm—a
two- or maybe three-bite hamburger. Being the middle kid of three is like being
the beef in a Sooperslider—you’re just there to weld the bun together.
Most people don’t
think about what’s inside the bun. They’d rather not know. But it’s important.
It’s what puts the slide in slider.
Slider will be
published this September.
4 comments:
Ha, ha, loved this. As the oldest of six and the built in babysitter, I never wanted a large family. My husband, the youngest of three, wanted a HUGE family. And, thanks for the info about Slider! I will feature it in a "Waiting on Wednesday" post on my blog, our student announcements and our school library web page!
brenda
Thanks, Brenda!
It's me again. Would you have any objection to me using your image and description in my post. I link back to your site and state it's coming from you…
TIA
brenda
Brenda, sorry I missed your last post. I was out of town for a while and am still getting caught up. Feel free to use whatever you find on my website: www.petehautman.com
Post a Comment